New white paper: how procurement and R&D turn Scope 3 data into reduction. Get the White Paper 

White Paper: Decide to Reduce

White Paper: Decide to Reduce

Breaking the Scope 3 Analysis Paralysis – a white paper by Sustainable and ctrl+s

Supply chain emissions fall when procurement and R&D change their recurring decisions – a more detailed Scope 3 inventory alone does not cut them.

Halfway to their 2030 targets, many companies have invested heavily in more detailed inventories, yet their supply chain emissions remain essentially flat. With a 30% reduction target against a 2020 baseline and flat emissions in 2025, the required pace roughly doubles, from about 3.5% to about 6.9% a year.

Decide to Reduce shows how to build the two things that change this: an organization that can decide, and data that supports decisions, not only reporting.

  • The five levers for cutting supply chain emissions and who typically owns each – from passive supplier alignment to product redesign
  • The three organizational conditions that let procurement and R&D act on these levers: mandate, capability, and governance
  • A data approach for each lever: product carbon footprints (PCFs) for strategic hotspot categories, and supplier-adjusted emission factors where supplier corporate carbon footprints (CCFs) fall short
  • A composite case study of a manufacturer that turned one corporate target into 14 category targets and cut Scope 3 emissions year-over-year for the first time in five years

Loading form…

Keep reading

White Paper: Outside the Perimeter
White Paper

White Paper: Outside the Perimeter

How European industry's critical raw material exposure sits where risk audits don't look.

White Paper: Outside the Perimeter
White Paper: The Scope 3 Gap
White Paper

White Paper: The Scope 3 Gap

Most companies still use supplier corporate carbon footprints as their primary input – but analysis of 62 CDP A-rated companies shows these numbers are unstable, inconsistent, and often misleading.

White Paper: The Scope 3 Gap
Scope 3 Analysis Paralysis: Why More Data Hasn't Cut Emissions
Whitepaper

Scope 3 Analysis Paralysis: Why More Data Hasn't Cut Emissions

Many companies have spent years improving their Scope 3 data while their upstream emissions have barely moved. The missing step is the decision: which supplier to work with, which one gets the next contract, which material goes into a product. Halfway to 2030, a flat footprint means doubling the reduction pace. This article explains why each of the five reduction levers needs different data, where PCFs and CCFs fall short in comparing suppliers, and three steps to get Scope 3 out of reporting mode.

Scope 3 Analysis Paralysis: Why More Data Hasn't Cut Emissions