New white paper: how procurement and R&D turn Scope 3 data into reduction. Get the White Paper 

White Paper: The Scope 3 Gap

White Paper: The Scope 3 Gap

Why Corporate Carbon Footprints Fall Short – and What to Do Instead

Are you relying on the wrong data for Scope 3?

Most companies still use supplier corporate carbon footprints as their primary input – but analysis of 62 CDP A-rated companies shows these numbers are unstable, inconsistent, and often misleading. This white paper reveals the pitfalls and offers a scalable way forward. In this white paper, you’ll learn:

  • Why Corporate Carbon Footprints (CCFs) are too volatile and inconsistent for Scope 3 tracking
  • How current methods obscure product-level hotspots and mislead procurement decisions
  • A practical blueprint for building reliable, scalable Scope 3 data systems that drive real reductions
  • Whether you’re just starting to refine your Scope 3 strategy or already deep in supplier engagement, this guide gives you the clarity to turn data into a driver fo real decarbonization. 

Download now to get the full insights.

Loading form…

Keep reading

White Paper: Decide to Reduce
White Paper

White Paper: Decide to Reduce

Supply chain emissions fall when procurement and R&D change their recurring decisions – a more detailed Scope 3 inventory alone does not cut them. The white paper "Decide to Reduce" by Sustainable and ctrl+s covers five reduction levers, who owns them, and the organizational conditions for acting on them. It shows which data each lever needs, from product carbon footprints (PCFs) to supplier-adjusted emission factors where supplier corporate carbon footprints (CCFs) fall short. A composite case study follows a manufacturer whose Scope 3 fell year-over-year for the first time in five years.

White Paper: Decide to Reduce
White Paper: Outside the Perimeter
White Paper

White Paper: Outside the Perimeter

How European industry's critical raw material exposure sits where risk audits don't look.

White Paper: Outside the Perimeter
Scope 3 Analysis Paralysis: Why More Data Hasn't Cut Emissions
Whitepaper

Scope 3 Analysis Paralysis: Why More Data Hasn't Cut Emissions

Many companies have spent years improving their Scope 3 data while their upstream emissions have barely moved. The missing step is the decision: which supplier to work with, which one gets the next contract, which material goes into a product. Halfway to 2030, a flat footprint means doubling the reduction pace. This article explains why each of the five reduction levers needs different data, where PCFs and CCFs fall short in comparing suppliers, and three steps to get Scope 3 out of reporting mode.

Scope 3 Analysis Paralysis: Why More Data Hasn't Cut Emissions