New white paper: how procurement and R&D turn Scope 3 data into reduction. Get the White Paper 

White Paper: Outside the Perimeter

White Paper: Outside the Perimeter

Most large European manufacturers can't see the majority of their critical raw material exposure. The gap is structural: the exposure arrives embedded in the parts and assemblies they source from suppliers, below the level any procurement system or risk register tracks.

China's 2023–2025 export controls brought this into focus. When rare-earth magnet shipments to Europe dropped by roughly 75 % in May 2025, several European carmakers idled production lines. The exposure had been real for years. The signal had been absent.

Outside the Perimeter quantifies this at EU level.

In this white paper:

  • How critical raw materials flow through supply chains into industries that never buy them by name – and why both EU policy maps and procurement systems miss them.
  • Where the exposure sits across all 33 EU-critical materials – and which sectors carry the highest concentration of hard-to-substitute spend.
  • Why China is the trigger but not the only choke point – and what the full supply-chain risk picture looks like.
  • How to map your company's exposure from existing procurement spend data, without a tedious supplier survey campaign.

Loading form…

Keep reading

White Paper: Decide to Reduce
White Paper

White Paper: Decide to Reduce

Supply chain emissions fall when procurement and R&D change their recurring decisions – a more detailed Scope 3 inventory alone does not cut them. The white paper "Decide to Reduce" by Sustainable and ctrl+s covers five reduction levers, who owns them, and the organizational conditions for acting on them. It shows which data each lever needs, from product carbon footprints (PCFs) to supplier-adjusted emission factors where supplier corporate carbon footprints (CCFs) fall short. A composite case study follows a manufacturer whose Scope 3 fell year-over-year for the first time in five years.

White Paper: Decide to Reduce
White Paper: The Scope 3 Gap
White Paper

White Paper: The Scope 3 Gap

Most companies still use supplier corporate carbon footprints as their primary input – but analysis of 62 CDP A-rated companies shows these numbers are unstable, inconsistent, and often misleading.

White Paper: The Scope 3 Gap
Scope 3 Analysis Paralysis: Why More Data Hasn't Cut Emissions
Whitepaper

Scope 3 Analysis Paralysis: Why More Data Hasn't Cut Emissions

Many companies have spent years improving their Scope 3 data while their upstream emissions have barely moved. The missing step is the decision: which supplier to work with, which one gets the next contract, which material goes into a product. Halfway to 2030, a flat footprint means doubling the reduction pace. This article explains why each of the five reduction levers needs different data, where PCFs and CCFs fall short in comparing suppliers, and three steps to get Scope 3 out of reporting mode.

Scope 3 Analysis Paralysis: Why More Data Hasn't Cut Emissions