Scope 3 industry insights directly to your inbox

Sign up to receive curated insights on Scope 3, supplier engagement, and supply chain decarbonization.

Your first email includes our white paper “The Scope 3 Gap”. A clear breakdown of why CCF-based Scope 3 approaches are unstable, plus a blueprint for a better path.

After that, we’ll share occasional updates - only when we have something worth sharing. Unsubscribe anytime.

What’s shifting in Scope 3 requirements and assurance readiness
Supplier engagement tactics that work across Tier 1 and long tail suppliers
How leading teams prioritize actions, not just measurement

Loading form…

Keep reading

Scope 3 Analysis Paralysis: Why More Data Hasn't Cut Emissions

November 2026

Whitepaper

Scope 3 Analysis Paralysis: Why More Data Hasn't Cut Emissions

Many companies have spent years improving their Scope 3 data while their upstream emissions have barely moved. The missing step is the decision: which supplier to work with, which one gets the next contract, which material goes into a product. Halfway to 2030, a flat footprint means doubling the reduction pace. This article explains why each of the five reduction levers needs different data, where PCFs and CCFs fall short in comparing suppliers, and three steps to get Scope 3 out of reporting mode.

October 2026

White Paper

White Paper: Decide to Reduce

Supply chain emissions fall when procurement and R&D change their recurring decisions – a more detailed Scope 3 inventory alone does not cut them. The white paper "Decide to Reduce" by Sustainable and ctrl+s covers five reduction levers, who owns them, and the organizational conditions for acting on them. It shows which data each lever needs, from product carbon footprints (PCFs) to supplier-adjusted emission factors where supplier corporate carbon footprints (CCFs) fall short. A composite case study follows a manufacturer whose Scope 3 fell year-over-year for the first time in five years.

How Enterprises Map Critical Raw Material Exposure Across a Complex Supply Chain

August 2026

How Enterprises Map Critical Raw Material Exposure Across a Complex Supply Chain

Supply chain disruptions cost industrial companies 15 days of downtime per year on average. Yet most manufacturers can't see where the risk sits – because critical raw materials (CRM) don't appear by name in a purchase order. With CRMA, CSDDD, and CSRD now raising the bar on supply chain transparency, compliance, and reporting, that blind spot is becoming a strategic liability. At Procurement Summit 2026, ctrl+s showed how to map CRM exposure from existing spend data – across every tier, every supplier, and all 33 EU-critical raw materials.